Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add Platform MHU mailbox driver for Amlogic GXBB

[Kevin Hilman]

Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Hi Jassi,
>>>>
>>>> Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> In order to support Mailbox links for the Amlogic GXBB SoC, add a generic
>>>>> platform MHU driver based on arm_mhu.c.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patchset follows a RFC thread along the GXBB SCPI support at :
>>>>> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466503374-28841-1-git-send-email-narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> And specific MHU discussions at :
>>>>> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CABb+yY3HqJG2+GMWCWF9PomxobrwWGZ=TZe5NvXPcHMDdLhkcQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since v1 at http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1470732737-18391-1-git-send-email-narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx :
>>>>>  - Fix irq to signed to detect platform_get_irq() failures
>>>>>  - Introduced back the secure channel
>>>>>  - Fixed indexes
>>>>
>>>> How is this version looking to you?
>>>>
>>>> With your review/ack on the driver, I'd be happy to take it via the
>>>> amlogic tree as there shouldn't be any conflicts with your tree.
>>>>
>>> I am ok with the driver, but I don't understand how it helps going via
>>> amlogic tree. I would like to send a pull request every release ;)
>>
>> That's fine with me too.  I offered tot take int just in case you had
>> already sent pull requests for this cycle, and also since I'll take
>> the DT changes through arm-soc.
>>
> This revision came after rc2, so it wasn't included. I will queue
> patch-1 & 2 for next release, and you the patch-3.

OK, sounds good.  Thanks,

Kevin