Re: ACPI-video: Fine-tuning for several function implementations

[SF Markus Elfring]

> I'd prefer this to be combined into fewer patches
> that each will address several issues of one type,

I understand your concern a bit in principle.


> ie. put all label renames into one patch,

Are any of my update suggestions controversial here?


> all size determination improvements into another one and so on.

I am unsure about the acceptance for the selected software change opportunities.
So I chose a very specific patch granularity intentionally.

I tend to provide some change ideas for each affected function
implementation individually. I imagine that this way should support
the recombination of update steps to some degree already, shouldn't it?

Regards,
Markus