Re: [PATCHv3 1/1] drm/imx: convey the pixelclk-active and de-active flags from DT to the ipu-di driver

[Thierry Reding]

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 03:18:16PM +0200, Lothar WaÃmann wrote:
> The 'de-active' and 'pixelclk-active' DT properties are evaluated
> by of_parse_display_timing() called from  of_get_drm_display_mode(),
> but later lost in the conversion from videomode.flags to
> drm_display_mode.flags.
> Use an open coded version of of_get_drm_display_mode() to get access
> to these flags and make sure they are passed on to the ipu-di driver.
> 
> Changes vs. v2:
>   - removed patches which have already been applied
>   - created a drm_bus_flags_from_videomode() helper to prevent code
>     duplication as suggested by Philipp Zabel
> 
> Changes vs. v1:
>   - rebased on top of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9113791/ as
>     per Philipp Zabel's request
> 
> GIT: [PATCHv2 1/3] drm/imx: imx-ldb: honor 'native-mode' property when
> GIT: [PATCHv2 2/3] drm/imx: convey the pixelclk-active and de-active flags
> GIT: [PATCHv2 3/3] drm/imx: remove dead code
> Signed-off-by: Lothar WaÃmann <LW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c            | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c          | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/imx/parallel-display.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
>  include/drm/drm_modes.h                |  5 +++--
>  4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Maybe a stupid question, but why does i.MX even allow video timings to
be specified in DT instead of going through panel drivers like everyone
else?

Thierry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature