Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: Document the STM32 USB OTG DWC2 core binding

From: Bruno Herrera
Date: Fri Jun 24 2016 - 14:51:44 EST


On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:25:49PM -0300, Bruno Herrera wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Bruno Herrera <bruherrera@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.txt | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.txt
>> index 20a68bf..79e5370 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.txt
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ Required properties:
>> - "lantiq,arx100-usb": The DWC2 USB controller instance in Lantiq ARX SoCs;
>> - "lantiq,xrx200-usb": The DWC2 USB controller instance in Lantiq XRX SoCs;
>> - snps,dwc2: A generic DWC2 USB controller with default parameters.
>> + - st,stm32-fsotg: The DWC2 USB controller instance in STM32F4 SoCs in FS mode;
>
> This should go above snps,dwc2.
>
Ok, tks!

> What determines FS mode vs. HS?
>
Its more HW design decision.
STM32F429/439/469 has two OTG controllers, one that is FS (internal
phy) and other that is HS (but can also work in FS mode with
internal/external phy)
This bind work with both cores FS and HS working with the internal PHY.

I tested the following configurations:
1 - STM32F429I-DISCOv1 board (OTG HS working in FS mode internal PHY)
2 - STM32F469I-DISCO board (OTG FS)

I did not tested OTG HS core working in FS mode with external PHY (I2C).

>> - reg : Should contain 1 register range (address and length)
>> - interrupts : Should contain 1 interrupt
>> - clocks: clock provider specifier
>> --
>> 2.7.4 (Apple Git-66)
>>