Re: [PATCH 00/10] Documentation/Sphinx

From: Jani Nikula
Date: Sat Jun 04 2016 - 07:45:48 EST


On Sat, 04 Jun 2016, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2016 23:05:34 +0300
> Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> To be clear, the "sphinx-for-docs-next" branch of [1], [2] is what I
>> propose to merge at this time. There's the Sphinx configuration, kernel
>> build integration, Sphinx kernel-doc extension, tons of kernel-doc
>> updates, etc.
>
> OK, I do believe that I am ready to do that. Many, many thanks for doing
> this work! Please drop me a note when you think that the branch is ready
> to go.

In case you missed the patch bomb in your inbox, I think it's ready
now. ;)

>> There is no DocBook tmpl conversion; all of that is left
>> to the authors (owners, maintainers) of the documents, but this enables
>> them to focus on that part.
>
> I would like to have some actual documents in there in the near future,
> so that interested folks have something to look at and start with. Maybe
> I'll do that myself with some of the docbooks without active maintainers,
> or even, maybe, some of the .txt files :)

So we'll be working on gpu.tmpl next and I'll look at
Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt too.

BR,
Jani.



--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center