Re: [PATCH] mfd: max77620: Fix FPS switch statements

From: Rhyland Klein
Date: Wed Jun 01 2016 - 11:29:44 EST


On 5/31/2016 3:30 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2016, Rhyland Klein wrote:
>
>> On 5/12/2016 1:52 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thursday 12 May 2016 11:15 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
>>>> When configuring FPS during probe, assuming a DT node is present for
>>>> FPS, the code can run into a problem with the switch statements in
>>>> max77620_config_fps() and max77620_get_fps_period_reg_value(). Namely,
>>>> in the case of chip->chip_id == MAX77620, it will set
>>>> fps_[mix|max]_period but then fall through to the default switch case
>>>> and return -EINVAL. Returning this from max77620_config_fps() will
>>>> cause probe to fail.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for fixes.
>>> Missed when converting if-else to switch.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>
>> Lee, I noticed this hasn't been merged yet, but without it platforms
>> using the max77620 can easily (if it has FPS nodes) fail to probe. Is
>> there anything blocking it?
>
> Yes, it was sent too late in the cycle.
>

Ok, thanks.

-rhyland

--
nvpublic