Re: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol.c: add memory allocation result check

From: Wenwei Tao
Date: Mon May 30 2016 - 05:28:45 EST


I think explicit BUG_ON may make the debug easier, since it can point
out the wrong line.

2016-05-30 16:53 GMT+08:00 Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon 30-05-16 16:45:51, Wenwei Tao wrote:
>> From: Wenwei Tao <ww.tao0320@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The mem_cgroup_tree_per_node allocation might fail,
>> check that before continue the memcg init. Since it
>> is in the init phase, trigger the panic if that failure
>> happens.
>
> We would blow up in the very same function so what is the point of the
> explicit BUG_ON?
>
>> Signed-off-by: Wenwei Tao <ww.tao0320@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> mm/memcontrol.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> index 925b431..6385c62 100644
>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> @@ -5712,6 +5712,7 @@ static int __init mem_cgroup_init(void)
>>
>> rtpn = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*rtpn), GFP_KERNEL,
>> node_online(node) ? node : NUMA_NO_NODE);
>> + BUG_ON(!rtpn);
>>
>> for (zone = 0; zone < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone++) {
>> struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_zone *rtpz;
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
>> the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
>> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
>> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
>
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs