Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] of: overlays: New target methods

From: Frank Rowand
Date: Fri May 27 2016 - 16:35:35 EST


On 5/27/2016 7:46 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
>> On May 27, 2016, at 00:15 , Frank Rowand <frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/16/2016 1:18 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>>> This patchset implements two new target methods.
>>>
>>> A target index method which allows selecting different
>>> targets according to an argument using an extended API and
>>> a target root method that fences the target only
>>> to a specific given root.
>>>
>>> Documentation and unit-tests are included.
>>
>> I think you are attacking the problem the wrong way.
>>
>> If I understand correctly, the problem statement is:
>>
>> In some cases, a devicetree overlay is meant to describe
>> a pluggable piece of hardware, which may be plugged into
>> various locations on a platform. It should be possible
>> to apply a single devicetree to one or more locations
>> on a given platform.
>>
>> If that is the case, then putting the locations where the
>> overlay can be applied into the devicetree is not the
>> approach that I would use. It seems it would be better
>> to specify the target location as a separate item from
>> the overlay to the method that applies the devicetree.
>> In that case, I would put the node(s) describing the
>> pluggable hardware in the root node of the overlay
>> devicetree (dtc expects a root node). The apply
>> method can easily find the node(s) and relocate them
>> to the appropriate location in the platform's
>> devicetree.
>>
>
> Itâs a bit more complicated. This was considered initially
> but we ended up with the targets on the overlay.
>
> It can work either way, but the problem with storing the
> indirect targets in the base tree is that there is no
> change in the bindings of the targets.

I am not suggesting putting the targets in the base tree.

I do not know where it should be. Still thinking about
that part.

>
> Putting things in the overlay seemed like it would have
> no effect on the base tree whatsoever.
>
>
>> -Frank
>>
>
> Regards
>
> â Pantelis
>
>