Re: [PATCH 3/5] PCI: Set PCI_BUS_FLAGS_MSI_REMAP if MSI controller supports IRQ remapping

From: Yongji Xie
Date: Wed May 25 2016 - 01:48:34 EST


On 2016/5/25 5:04, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 08:43:28PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
On ARM HW the capability of IRQ remapping is abstracted on
MSI controller side. MSI_FLAG_IRQ_REMAPPING is used to advertise
this [1].

To have a universal flag to test this capability for different
archs on PCI side, we set PCI_BUS_FLAGS_MSI_REMAP for PCI buses
when MSI_FLAG_IRQ_REMAPPING is set.

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg130256.html

Signed-off-by: Yongji Xie <xyjxie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pci/msi.c | 12 ++++++++++++
drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 +++
include/linux/msi.h | 6 +++++-
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index a080f44..1661cdf 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -1134,6 +1134,18 @@ void *msi_desc_to_pci_sysdata(struct msi_desc *desc)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(msi_desc_to_pci_sysdata);
+void pci_bus_check_msi_remapping(struct pci_bus *bus,
+ struct irq_domain *domain)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
+ struct msi_domain_info *info;
+
+ info = msi_get_domain_info(domain);
+ if (info->flags & MSI_FLAG_IRQ_REMAPPING)
+ bus->bus_flags |= PCI_BUS_FLAGS_MSI_REMAP;
+#endif
+}
Functions named "check_foo" are a pet peeve of mine because the name
doesn't tell us anything about what the function *does*. In this
case, we know it checks something about MSI remapping, but we don't
know whether we're checking whether it's enabled, disabled, or some
other property.

I'd prefer something like:

int pci_bus_msi_isolated(struct pci_bus *bus, struct irq_domain *domain)
{
struct msi_domain_info *info;

if (!domain)
return 0;

info = msi_get_domain_info(domain);
if (info->flags & MSI_FLAG_IRQ_REMAPPING)
return 1;

return 0;
}

void pci_set_bus_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
{
...
if (b == bus && pci_bus_msi_isolated(bus, d))
bus->bus_flags |= PCI_BUS_FLAGS_MSI_REMAP;

Yes. This looks more reasonable. Thank you!

Regards,
Yongji