Re: [PATCH] FUSE: Improve aio directIO write performance for size extending writes.

From: Ashish Sangwan
Date: Thu Apr 14 2016 - 08:32:57 EST


*ping*

Last time it bounced off the fuse mailing list.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Ashish Sangwan <ashishsangwan2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> While sending the blocking directIO in fuse, the write request is broken
> into sub-requests, each of default size 128k and all the requests are sent
> in non-blocking background mode if async_dio mode is supported by libfuse.
> The process which issue the write wait for the completion of all the
> sub-requests. Sending multiple requests parallely gives a chance to perform
> parallel writes in the user space fuse implementation if it is
> multi-threaded and hence improves the performance.
>
> When there is a size extending aio dio write, we switch to
> blocking mode so that we can properly update the size of the file after
> completion of the writes. However, in this situation all the sub-requests
> are sent in serialized manner where the next request is sent only after
> receiving the reply of the current request. Hence the multi-threaded user
> space implementation is not utilized properly.
>
> This patch changes the size extending aio dio behavior to exactly follow
> blocking dio. For multi threaded fuse implementation having 10 threads and
> using buffer size of 64MB to perform async directIO, we are getting double
> the speed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <ashishsangwan2@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/fuse/file.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
> index 9dde38f..b4f8b83 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/file.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
> @@ -572,11 +572,11 @@ static void fuse_aio_complete(struct fuse_io_priv *io, int err, ssize_t pos)
> io->bytes = pos;
>
> left = --io->reqs;
> - if (!left && is_sync)
> + if (!left && (is_sync || io->blocking_aio))
> complete(io->done);
> spin_unlock(&io->lock);
>
> - if (!left && !is_sync) {
> + if (!left && !is_sync && !io->blocking_aio) {
> ssize_t res = fuse_get_res_by_io(io);
>
> if (res >= 0) {
> @@ -2884,17 +2884,17 @@ fuse_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, loff_t offset)
> */
> io->async = async_dio;
> io->iocb = iocb;
> + io->blocking_aio = false;
>
> /*
> - * We cannot asynchronously extend the size of a file. We have no method
> - * to wait on real async I/O requests, so we must submit this request
> - * synchronously.
> + * We cannot asynchronously extend the size of a file.
> + * In such case the aio will behave exactly like sync io.
> */
> if (!is_sync && (offset + count > i_size) &&
> iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE)
> - io->async = false;
> + io->blocking_aio = true;
>
> - if (io->async && is_sync) {
> + if (io->async && (is_sync | io->blocking_aio)) {
> /*
> * Additional reference to keep io around after
> * calling fuse_aio_complete()
> @@ -2914,7 +2914,7 @@ fuse_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, loff_t offset)
> fuse_aio_complete(io, ret < 0 ? ret : 0, -1);
>
> /* we have a non-extending, async request, so return */
> - if (!is_sync)
> + if (!is_sync && !io->blocking_aio)
> return -EIOCBQUEUED;
>
> wait_for_completion(&wait);
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> index eddbe02..a7cf03f 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> +++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> @@ -256,6 +256,7 @@ struct fuse_io_priv {
> struct kiocb *iocb;
> struct file *file;
> struct completion *done;
> + bool blocking_aio;
> };
>
> #define FUSE_IO_PRIV_SYNC(f) \
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>