Re: [PATCH V4 4/7] ARM64, ACPI, PCI: I/O Remapping Table (IORT) initial support.

[Tomasz Nowicki]

On 13.04.2016 23:18, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 4/13/2016 11:52 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > > Sure. Please see:
> > > > http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0049a/DEN0049A_IO_Remapping_Table.pdf
> > > > 3.1.1.5 PCI root complex node
> > > > PCI Segment number -> The PCI segment number, as in MCFG and as
> > > > returned by _SEG in the namespace.
> > > >
> > > > So IORT spec states that pci_segment_number corresponds to the segment
> > > > number from MCFG table and _SEG method. Here is my patch which makes
> > > > sure pci_domain_nr(bus) is set properly:
> > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/16/418
> > Lovely. So this series is actually dependent on the PCI one. I guess we
> > need to solve that one first, because IORT seems pretty pointless if we
> > don't have PCI support. What's the plan?
>
> Would it be OK to split the PCI specific section of the patch and continue
> review? PCI is a user of the IORT table. Not the other way around.

I need to disagree. What would be the use case for patches w/o "PCI part" ?

Tomasz