RE: [RFC PATCH 4/4] pinctrl: Parse GpioInt/GpioIo resources

From: Tirdea, Irina
Date: Mon Apr 04 2016 - 10:05:44 EST




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mika Westerberg [mailto:mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 04 April, 2016 16:48
> To: Tirdea, Irina
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki; Len Brown; Linus Walleij; linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Rob Herring; Heikki Krogerus;
> Andy Shevchenko; Purdila, Octavian; Ciocan, Cristina; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] pinctrl: Parse GpioInt/GpioIo resources
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 02:44:45PM +0300, Irina Tirdea wrote:
> > +static int acpi_parse_gpio_res(struct pinctrl *p,
> > + struct pinctrl_map **map,
> > + unsigned *num_maps,
> > + struct pinctrl_dev ***pctldevs)
> > +{
> > + struct acpi_gpio_lookup lookup;
> > + struct list_head res_list;
> > + struct acpi_device *adev;
> > + unsigned int index;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + adev = ACPI_COMPANION(p->dev);
> > +
> > + *map = NULL;
> > + *num_maps = 0;
> > + memset(&lookup, 0, sizeof(lookup));
> > +
> > + /* Parse all GpioInt/GpioIo resources in _CRS and extract pin conf */
> > + for (index = 0; ; index++) {
> > + lookup.index = index;
> > + lookup.n = 0;
> > + lookup.found = false;
> > +
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&res_list);
> > + ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &res_list, acpi_gpio_to_map,
> > + &lookup);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto exit_free;
> > + acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&res_list);
> > + if (!lookup.found)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + *map = lookup.map;
> > + *num_maps = lookup.num_maps;
> > + *pctldevs = lookup.pctldevs;
>
> This function has quite many stars in arguments and in the function
> body. In particular pctldevs has three stars!
>
> I wonder if this could be written in such way that avoids that. Like
> create a structure holding the map information and pass that to the
> function instead.
>


Yes, that would make the code more clear. I will rewrite it using a structure.

> Other parts of the patch look good to me.