Re: [PART1 RFC v2 03/10] svm: Introduce new AVIC VMCB registers

From: Suravee Suthikulpanit
Date: Mon Mar 14 2016 - 03:42:45 EST


Hi,

On 03/07/2016 10:44 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:

On 04/03/2016 21:46, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>From: Suravee Suthikulpanit<suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>
>
>Introduce new AVIC VMCB registers. Also breakdown int_ctl register
>into bit-field for ease of use.
>
>Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit<suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>
>---
> arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
>index 6136d99..db5d7af 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
>+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
>@@ -67,10 +67,24 @@ struct __attribute__ ((__packed__)) vmcb_control_area {
> u32 asid;
> u8 tlb_ctl;
> u8 reserved_2[3];
>- u32 int_ctl;
>+ union { /* Offset 0x60 */
>+ u32 int_ctl;
>+
>+ struct __attribute__ ((__packed__)) {
>+ u32 v_tpr : 8,
>+ v_irq : 1,
>+ reserved_3 : 7,
>+ v_intr_prio : 4,
>+ v_ign_tpr : 1,
>+ reserved_4 : 3,
>+ v_intr_masking : 1,
>+ reserved_5 : 6,
>+ avic_enable : 1;
Please do not introduce bitfields and drop patch 4.

Thanks,

Paolo


Any particular reason why you do not recommend the use of bit field?

Thanks,
Suravee