Re: [PATCH 1/5] ftrace perf: Check sample types only for sampling events

[Jiri Olsa]

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 08:25:02AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 09:36:37AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Hi Jiri,
> > 
> > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 09:46:41PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > Currently we check sample type for ftrace:function event
> > > even if it's not created as sampling event. That prevents
> > > creating ftrace_function event in counting mode.
> > > 
> > > Making sure we check sample types only for sampling events.
> > > 
> > > Before:
> > >   $ sudo perf stat -e ftrace:function ls
> > >   ...
> > > 
> > >    Performance counter stats for 'ls':
> > > 
> > >      <not supported>      ftrace:function
> > > 
> > >          0.001983662 seconds time elapsed
> > > 
> > > After:
> > >   $ sudo perf stat -e ftrace:function ls
> > >   ...
> > > 
> > >    Performance counter stats for 'ls':
> > > 
> > >               44,498      ftrace:function
> > > 
> > >          0.037534722 seconds time elapsed
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c | 4 ++--
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
> > > index 00df25fd86ef..a7171ec2c1ca 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
> > > @@ -52,14 +52,14 @@ static int perf_trace_event_perm(struct trace_event_call *tp_event,
> > >  		 * event, due to issues with page faults while tracing page
> > >  		 * fault handler and its overall trickiness nature.
> > >  		 */
> > > -		if (!p_event->attr.exclude_callchain_user)
> > > +		if (is_sampling_event(p_event) && !p_event->attr.exclude_callchain_user)
> > >  			return -EINVAL;
> > >  
> > >  		/*
> > >  		 * Same reason to disable user stack dump as for user space
> > >  		 * callchains above.
> > >  		 */
> > > -		if (p_event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER)
> > > +		if (is_sampling_event(p_event) && p_event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER)
> > >  			return -EINVAL;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > 
> > What about checking is_sampling_event() first and goto the last
> > paranoid_tracepoint_raw check instead?  This way we can remove the
> > same check in the function trace case.
> 
> right, will check

hum, did you mean something like this?

I'd rather keep it the original way.. seems more straight

jirka


---
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
index 00df25fd86ef..7c1edb57c823 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
@@ -44,23 +44,22 @@ static int perf_trace_event_perm(struct trace_event_call *tp_event,
 
 	/* The ftrace function trace is allowed only for root. */
 	if (ftrace_event_is_function(tp_event)) {
-		if (perf_paranoid_tracepoint_raw() && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
-			return -EPERM;
-
 		/*
 		 * We don't allow user space callchains for  function trace
 		 * event, due to issues with page faults while tracing page
 		 * fault handler and its overall trickiness nature.
 		 */
-		if (!p_event->attr.exclude_callchain_user)
+		if (is_sampling_event(p_event) && !p_event->attr.exclude_callchain_user)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
 		/*
 		 * Same reason to disable user stack dump as for user space
 		 * callchains above.
 		 */
-		if (p_event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER)
+		if (is_sampling_event(p_event) && p_event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER)
 			return -EINVAL;
+
+		goto root_check;
 	}
 
 	/* No tracing, just counting, so no obvious leak */
@@ -73,6 +72,7 @@ static int perf_trace_event_perm(struct trace_event_call *tp_event,
 			return 0;
 	}
 
+root_check:
 	/*
 	 * ...otherwise raw tracepoint data can be a severe data leak,
 	 * only allow root to have these.