Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] clk: rockchip: add new pll-type for rk3399 and similar socs

From: Xing Zheng
Date: Wed Mar 09 2016 - 22:26:10 EST


Hi Heiko,

On 2016å03æ09æ 20:29, Heiko StÃbner wrote:
Hi Xing,

Am Mittwoch, 9. MÃrz 2016, 10:42:58 schrieb Xing Zheng:
The rk3399's pll and clock are similar with rk3036's, it different
with base on the rk3066(rk3188, rk3288, rk3368 use it), there are
different adjust foctors and control registers, so these should be
independent and separate from the series of rk3066s.

Signed-off-by: Xing Zheng <zhengxing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Changes in v3: None
Changes in v2: None

drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c | 279
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h |
3 +-
2 files changed, 280 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
index 27be66a..62d2f0e 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-pll.c
@@ -593,6 +593,275 @@ static const struct clk_ops
rockchip_rk3066_pll_clk_ops = { .init = rockchip_rk3066_pll_init,
};

+/**
+ * PLL used in RK3399
+ */
+
+#define RK3399_PLLCON(i) (i * 0x4)
+#define RK3399_PLLCON0_FBDIV_MASK 0xfff
+#define RK3399_PLLCON0_FBDIV_SHIFT 0
+#define RK3399_PLLCON1_REFDIV_MASK 0x3f
+#define RK3399_PLLCON1_REFDIV_SHIFT 0
+#define RK3399_PLLCON1_POSTDIV1_MASK 0x7
+#define RK3399_PLLCON1_POSTDIV1_SHIFT 8
+#define RK3399_PLLCON1_POSTDIV2_MASK 0x7
+#define RK3399_PLLCON1_POSTDIV2_SHIFT 12
+#define RK3399_PLLCON2_FRAC_MASK 0xffffff
+#define RK3399_PLLCON2_FRAC_SHIFT 0
please move RK3399_PLLCON2_LOCK_STATUS here
Done.
+#define RK3399_PLLCON3_DSMPD_MASK 0x1
+#define RK3399_PLLCON3_DSMPD_SHIFT 12
DSMPD_SHIFT should be 3, right?
Yes, I'm sorry to careless.

+
+#define RK3399_PLLCON2_LOCK_STATUS (31 << 0)
that is wrong, you want (1 << 31), or even better BIT(31) here
Yes, done.

+#define RK3399_PLLCON3_PWRDOWN (1 << 0)
dito, BIT(0) please
Done.
+static int rockchip_rk3399_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long
drate, + unsigned long prate)
+{
+ struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll = to_rockchip_clk_pll(hw);
+ const struct rockchip_pll_rate_table *rate;
+ unsigned long old_rate = rockchip_rk3399_pll_recalc_rate(hw, prate);
+ struct regmap *grf = rockchip_clk_get_grf(pll->ctx);
+
+ if (IS_ERR(grf)) {
+ pr_debug("%s: grf regmap not available, aborting rate change\n",
+ __func__);
+ return PTR_ERR(grf);
+ }
the pll lock-status moved to the pll registers it seems, so you don't need to
get the GRF here at all, as we don't need it for the lock status.
Yes, done.

Thanks.

--
- Xing Zheng