Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 9 (net: bpf)

[Daniel Borkmann]

On 03/09/2016 06:07 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/09/16 08:48, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > On 03/09/2016 05:44 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On 03/08/16 21:38, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Changes since 20160308:
> > >
> > > on x86_64:
> > >
> > > ../net/core/filter.c: In function 'bpf_skb_get_tunnel_opt':
> > > ../net/core/filter.c:1824:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ip_tunnel_info_opts_get' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > >     ip_tunnel_info_opts_get(to, info);
> > >     ^
> > > ../net/core/filter.c: In function 'bpf_skb_set_tunnel_opt':
> > > ../net/core/filter.c:1918:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ip_tunnel_info_opts_set' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > >     ip_tunnel_info_opts_set(info, from, size);
> > >     ^
> > > Full randconfig file is attached.
> >
> > Already fixed with net-next commit e28e87ed474c ("ip_tunnel, bpf:
> > ip_tunnel_info_opts_{get, set} depends on CONFIG_INET").
[...]
> Is that patch on the netdev mailing list or patchwork?
> I can't find it.

It is in patchwork archive or also here:

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/commit/?id=e28e87ed474c5a0b378c66fb85efc8e487f4f63f

Was reported first by Fengguang's build bot i.e. his config had !CONFIG_INET
like in your case, so should resolve the issue.

Thanks,
Daniel