Re: Interesting csd deadlock on ARC

From: Vineet Gupta
Date: Tue Feb 23 2016 - 00:22:39 EST


On Friday 19 February 2016 12:17 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I've been debugging a csd_lock_wait() deadlock on SMP+PREEMPT ARC HS38x2 and it
> turned out to be lot more interesting than I'd hoped for. This is stock v4.4
>
> Trouble starts with an IPI to self which doesn't get delivered as the inter-core
> interrupt providing h/w is not capable of IPI to self (which I found as part of
> debugging this). Subsequent IPIs from other cores to this core get elided as well
> due to the IPI coalescing optimization in arch/arc/kernel/smp.c: ipi_send_msg_one()
>
> There are ways to use a different h/w mechanism to solve the trigger issue and I'd
> hoped to just implement arch_irq_work_raise(). But the trouble is the call stack
> for this issue: IPI to self is triggered from
>
> sys_sched_setscheduler
> __balance_callback
> pull_rt_task
> irq_work_queue_on <-- called with @cpu == self
>
> Looking into irq_work.c, irq_work_queue() is what is semantically needed,
> specifically arch_irq_work_raise() will not be called, which means I need
> arch_send_call_function_single_ipi() to be able to IPI to self cpu also. Is that
> expected from arch code....

What I actually meant was is it OK for irq_work_queue_on() to be called locally
(is this a sched bug/optimization(. Further if it is OK to be called, does it need
to do behave more like irq_work_queue() i.e. call arch_irq_work_raise() or
arch_send_call_function_single_ipi() is expected to handle sending IPI to self !

>
> Just wanted to understand before writing patches...
>
> Test case triggering is harmless looking LTP: trace_sched -c 1
> It is kind of scheduler fizzer as it triggers a whole bunch of sched activity.
>
> Thx,
> -Vineet
>