Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] memremap: add arch specific hook for MEMREMAP_WB mappings

From: Dan Williams
Date: Mon Feb 22 2016 - 14:55:41 EST


On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 22 February 2016 at 20:05, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Ard Biesheuvel
>> <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Currently, the memremap code serves MEMREMAP_WB mappings directly from
>>> the kernel direct mapping, unless the region is in high memory, in which
>>> case it falls back to using ioremap_cache(). However, the semantics of
>>> ioremap_cache() are not unambiguously defined, and on ARM, it will
>>> actually result in a mapping type that differs from the attributes used
>>> for the linear mapping, and for this reason, the ioremap_cache() call
>>> fails if the region is part of the memory managed by the kernel.
>>>
>>> So instead, implement an optional hook 'arch_memremap_wb' whose default
>>> implementation calls ioremap_cache() as before, but which can be
>>> overridden by the architecture to do what is appropriate for it.
>>>
>>
>> Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> I still have patches pending to delete ioremap_cache() from ARM and
>> require memremap() to be used for cacheable mappings. Do you see any
>> use for ioremap_cache() on ARM after this change?
>
> I am not exactly sure why ioremap_cache() does not use MT_MEMORY_RW
> attributes, but the ARM architecture simply does not allow mismatched
> attributes, so we cannot simply replace each instance of
> ioremap_cache() with memremap()
>
> Perhaps Russell can explain?

>From the x86 perspective mismatched mappings are also disallowed. The
goal of deprecating ioremap_cache() in favor of memremap() is simply
that the __iomem annotation is misplaced [1], and to clean up the
calling convention to be explicit without silent fallbacks to
different mapping types.

[1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/653585/