Re: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU from 4.5-rc3, since 3.17

From: Ross Green
Date: Fri Feb 19 2016 - 23:34:39 EST


On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 4:33 AM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 08:13:18PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Ross Green <rgkernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Well a bonus extra!
>> > Kept everything running and there was another stall.
>> > So i have included the demsg output for perusal.
>> >
>> > Just to clear things up there is no hotplug involved in this system.
>> > It is a standard Pandaboard ES Ti4460 two processor system.
>> > I use this for testing as a generic armv7 processor, plus can keep it
>> > just running along for testing for a long time. the system has a total
>> > of 23-25 process running on average. Mainly standard daemons. There is
>> > certainly no heavy processing going on. I run a series of benchmarks
>> > that are cpu intensive for the first 20 miinutes after boot and then
>> > just leave it idle away. checking every so often to see how it has
>> > gone.
>> > As mentioned I have observed these stalls going back to 3.17 kernel.
>> > It will often take up to a week to record such a stall. I will
>> > typically test every new release kernel, so the -rc? series will get
>> > around a weeks testing.
>>
>> Sorry. Kind of hopping in a bit late here. Is this always happening
>> with just the pandaboard? Or are you seeing this on different
>> machines?
>>
>> Have you tried enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING just in case
>> something is going awry there?
>
> Excellent point -- timekeeping issues have caused this sort of issue
> in the past.
>
> Ross, on your next test, could you please enable CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING
> as John suggests?
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
As John has suggested have already enabled CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING.

So far just on 1 day running.

Sigh...!! Nothing to report as yet, only one day on the clock.
Its like watching grass grow!



Regards,


Ross Green