Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: s2mps11: Simplify expression used in BUILD_BUG_ON

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Wed Feb 17 2016 - 20:39:07 EST


On 18.02.2016 10:37, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
>> Following BUILD_BUG_ON using a variable fails for some of the compilers
>> and optimization levels (reported for gcc 4.9):
>> var = ARRAY_SIZE(s2mps15_regulators);
>> BUILD_BUG_ON(S2MPS_REGULATOR_MAX < var);
>> Fix this by using ARRAY_SIZE directly.
>>
>> Additionally add missing BUILD_BUG_ON check for S2MPS15 device (the
>> check ensures that internal arrays are big enough to hold data for all
>> of regulators on all devices).
>>
>> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>
> [...]
>
>> case S2MPS11X:
>> s2mps11->rdev_num = ARRAY_SIZE(s2mps11_regulators);
>
> Why don't we remove rdev_num at all? It's not used that much
> other than in the probe function.

Remove from probe? It is used in probe and removal would make the code
more complicated than it should be.

Best regards,
Krzysztof