Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks

[Steve Muckle]

Hi Rafael,

On 02/08/2016 03:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Now that all review comments have been addressed in patch [3/3], I'm going to
> put this series into linux-next.
> 
> There already is 20+ patches on top of it in the queue including fixes for
> bugs that have haunted us for quite some time (and that functionally depend on
> this set) and I'd really like all that to get enough linux-next coverage, so
> there really isn't more time to wait.

Sorry for the late reply. As Juri mentioned I was OOO last week and
really just got to look at this today.

One concern I had was, given that the lone scheduler update hook is in
CFS, is it possible for governor updates to be stalled due to RT or DL
task activity?

thanks,
Steve