Re: [PATCH] gpio: 104-idio-16: Return IRQ_NONE if all relevant GPIO lines are masked

From: William Breathitt Gray
Date: Wed Jan 20 2016 - 13:37:46 EST

Next message: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [RFC V2 2/2] sched: idle: IRQ based next prediction for idle period"
Previous message: Rob Herring: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: power: reset: add document for reboot-mode driver"
In reply to: William Breathitt Gray: "[PATCH] gpio: 104-idio-16: Return IRQ_NONE if all relevant GPIO lines are masked"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Please ignore this patch.

This device cannot differentiate between its own and other devices'
interrupt requests. IRQ should not be shared with this device.

William Breathitt Gray

Next message: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [RFC V2 2/2] sched: idle: IRQ based next prediction for idle period"
Previous message: Rob Herring: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: power: reset: add document for reboot-mode driver"
In reply to: William Breathitt Gray: "[PATCH] gpio: 104-idio-16: Return IRQ_NONE if all relevant GPIO lines are masked"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]