Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] perf/x86/amd/power: Add AMD accumulated power reporting mechanism

From: Huang Rui
Date: Tue Jan 19 2016 - 23:49:02 EST


Hi Peter,

Thanks so much to your comments.

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 01:12:50PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:50:08AM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> > +struct power_pmu {
> > + spinlock_t lock;
>
> This should be a raw_spinlock_t, as it'll be nested under other
> raw_spinlock_t's.
>

Do you mean the following spinlock operations are in hardware
interrupts disabled case, so I need use raw_spinlock_t instead, right?

Use raw_spin_lock_irqsave/raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore?

> > + struct list_head active_list;
> > + struct pmu *pmu; /* pointer to power_pmu_class */
> > + local64_t cpu_sw_pwr_ptsc;
> > +};
>
> > +static void pmu_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int mode)
> > +{
> > + struct power_pmu *pmu = __this_cpu_read(amd_power_pmu);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
>
> IRQs will be disabled here.
>
> > + __pmu_event_start(pmu, event);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void pmu_event_stop(struct perf_event *event, int mode)
> > +{
> > + struct power_pmu *pmu = __this_cpu_read(amd_power_pmu);
> > + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
>
> idem
>
> > +
> > + /* mark event as deactivated and stopped */
> > + if (!(hwc->state & PERF_HES_STOPPED)) {
> > + list_del(&event->active_entry);
> > + hwc->state |= PERF_HES_STOPPED;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* check if update of sw counter is necessary */
> > + if ((mode & PERF_EF_UPDATE) && !(hwc->state & PERF_HES_UPTODATE)) {
> > + /*
> > + * Drain the remaining delta count out of a event
> > + * that we are disabling:
> > + */
> > + event_update(event, pmu);
> > + hwc->state |= PERF_HES_UPTODATE;
> > + }
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int pmu_event_add(struct perf_event *event, int mode)
> > +{
> > + struct power_pmu *pmu = __this_cpu_read(amd_power_pmu);
> > + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
> > +
>
> idem
>
> > + hwc->state = PERF_HES_UPTODATE | PERF_HES_STOPPED;
> > +
> > + if (mode & PERF_EF_START)
> > + __pmu_event_start(pmu, event);
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
>
> > +static int power_cpu_init(int cpu)
> > +{
> > + int i, cu, ret = 0;
> > + cpumask_var_t mask, dummy_mask;
> > +
> > + cu = cpu / cores_per_cu;
> > +
> > + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&mask, GFP_KERNEL))
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&dummy_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < cores_per_cu; i++)
> > + cpumask_set_cpu(i, mask);
> > +
> > + cpumask_shift_left(mask, mask, cu * cores_per_cu);
> > +
> > + if (!cpumask_and(dummy_mask, mask, &cpu_mask))
> > + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_mask);
> > +
> > + free_cpumask_var(dummy_mask);
> > +out:
> > + free_cpumask_var(mask);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
>
> > +static int power_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *self,
> > + unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int cpu = (long)hcpu;
> > +
> > + switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
> > + case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
> > + if (power_cpu_prepare(cpu))
> > + return NOTIFY_BAD;
> > + break;
> > + case CPU_STARTING:
> > + if (power_cpu_init(cpu))
> > + return NOTIFY_BAD;
>
> this is called with IRQs disabled, which makes those GFP_KERNEL allocs
> above a pretty bad idea.
>

Right, so should I use GFP_ATOMIC to allocate cpumask here?

> Also, note that -rt cannot actually do _any_ allocations/frees from
> STARTING.
>
> Please move the allocs/frees to PREPARE/ONLINE.
>

How about add two cpumask_var_t at power_pmu structure? Then allocate
the two cpumask_var_t (pmu->mask, pmu->dummy_mask), and they can be
also used on power_cpu_init.

Thanks,
Rui