Re: [PATCH] mm: make apply_to_page_range more robust

From: Pekka Enberg
Date: Sun Jan 17 2016 - 05:03:08 EST


On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Mika PenttilÃ
<mika.penttila@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Recent changes (4.4.0+) in module loader triggered oops on ARM. While
> loading a module, size in :
>
> apply_to_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, unsigned
> long size, pte_fn_t fn, void *data);
>
> can be 0 triggering the bug BUG_ON(addr >= end);.
>
> Fix by letting call with zero size succeed.
>
> --Mika
>
> Signed-off-by: mika.penttila@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>

We could also replace that BUG_ON() with a WARN_ON() and return -EINVAL.

> ---
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index c387430..c3d1a2e 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -1884,6 +1884,9 @@ int apply_to_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm,
> unsigned long addr,
> unsigned long end = addr + size;
> int err;
>
> + if (!size)
> + return 0;
> +
> BUG_ON(addr >= end);
> pgd = pgd_offset(mm, addr);
> do {
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>