Re: [PATCH 1/2] MAINTAINERS: return arch/sh to maintained state, with new maintainers

[Rich Felker]

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:40:46AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:53:07PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:39:59PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
> > > From: Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Add Yoshinori Sato and Rich Felker as maintainers for arch/sh
> > > (SUPERH).
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Acked-by: D. Jeff Dionne <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Acked-by: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > A much appreciated move,
> > 
> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Likewise,
> 
> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

While patch 2/2 still seems to need discussion and resolution, I don't
think this part (1/2, adding us as maintainers) is controversial. Can
it be committed now? Geert? Andrew?

Rich