Re: [RFC PATCH 18/19] cpufreq: remove transition_lock

[Viresh Kumar]

On 11-01-16, 17:35, Juri Lelli wrote:
> From: Michael Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> transition_lock was introduced to serialize cpufreq transition
> notifiers. Instead of using a different lock for protecting concurrent
> modifications of policy, it is better to require that callers of
> transition notifiers implement appropriate locking (this is already the
> case AFAICS). Removing transition_lock also simplifies current locking
> scheme.

So, are you saying that the reasoning mentioned in this patch are all
wrong?

commit 12478cf0c55e ("cpufreq: Make sure frequency transitions are
serialized")

-- 
viresh