Re: [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of topology_physical_package_id

[Viresh Kumar]

On 23-12-15, 11:37, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> The function can return negative values, so its result should
> be assigned to signed variable.
> 
> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
> 
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
> index 2c3b16f..de5e89b 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static struct scpi_ops *scpi_ops;
>  
>  static struct scpi_dvfs_info *scpi_get_dvfs_info(struct device *cpu_dev)
>  {
> -	u8 domain = topology_physical_package_id(cpu_dev->id);
> +	int domain = topology_physical_package_id(cpu_dev->id);
>  
>  	if (domain < 0)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/