Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-pci: Add platform tuning callback for amd hs200 mode

From: Wan ZongShun
Date: Tue Dec 22 2015 - 19:18:43 EST


>> +
>> static const struct sdhci_pci_fixes sdhci_amd = {
>> .probe = amd_probe,
>> + .probe_slot = amd_probe_slot,
>> };
>>
>> static const struct pci_device_id pci_ids[] = {
>> @@ -1508,6 +1519,17 @@ static int sdhci_pci_select_drive_strength(struct sdhci_host *host,
>> card_drv, drv_type);
>> }
>>
>> +static int sdhci_pci_platform_execute_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host,
>> + u32 opcode)
>> +{
>> + struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot = sdhci_priv(host);
>> +
>> + if (!slot->platform_execute_tuning)
>> + return -EPERM;
>
> Here you return an error code.
>
>> +
>> + return slot->platform_execute_tuning(host, opcode);
>> +}
>> +
>> static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_pci_ops = {
>> .set_clock = sdhci_set_clock,
>> .enable_dma = sdhci_pci_enable_dma,
>> @@ -1516,6 +1538,7 @@ static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_pci_ops = {
>> .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
>> .hw_reset = sdhci_pci_hw_reset,
>> .select_drive_strength = sdhci_pci_select_drive_strength,
>> + .platform_execute_tuning = sdhci_pci_platform_execute_tuning,
>> };
>>
>> /*****************************************************************************\
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.h
>> index d1a0b4d..48d98f1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.h
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.h
>> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ struct sdhci_pci_slot {
>> struct mmc_card *card,
>> unsigned int max_dtr, int host_drv,
>> int card_drv, int *drv_type);
>> + int (*platform_execute_tuning)(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode);
>> };
>>
>> struct sdhci_pci_chip {
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> index 2753b722d..2a5a6ce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> @@ -1937,7 +1937,8 @@ static int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>> err = host->ops->platform_execute_tuning(host, opcode);
>> sdhci_runtime_pm_put(host);
>> - return err;
>> + if (err != EPERM)
>
> âand here you ignore it. Perhaps better to introduce various positive codes
>
> #define AMD_TUNNING_DONE 0
> #define AMD_TUNNING_NA 1

Andy, It looks a good idea, thanks.


>
>
>> + return err;
>> }
>>
>> ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko



--
---
Vincent Wan(Zongshun)
www.mcuos.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/