Re: [PATCH] drivers/char/mem.c: Add /dev/ioports, supporting 16-bit and 32-bit ports

[H. Peter Anvin]

On December 22, 2015 1:56:20 PM PST, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Tuesday 22 December 2015, Santosh Shukla wrote:
>> }
>> 
>> So I care for /dev/ioport types interface who could do more than byte
>> data copy to/from user-space. I tested this patch with little
>> modification and could able to run pmd driver for arm/arm64 case.
>> 
>> Like to know how to address pci_io region mapping problem for
>> arm/arm64, in-case /dev/ioports approach is not acceptable or else I
>> can spent time on restructuring the patch?
>> 
>
>For the use case you describe, can't you use the vfio framework to
>access the PCI BARs?
>
>After all, you are talking about regular PCI devices, not access to
>random unknown I/O port numbers.
>
>	Arnd

On that subject, shouldn't we have common infrastructure to deal with memory mapped I/O ports in the kernel?  Or do we have that now?  I obviously don't pay too much attention...
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse brevity and formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/