Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] staging: lustre: Less checks in mgc_process_recover_log() after error detection

From: SF Markus Elfring
Date: Tue Dec 22 2015 - 02:16:04 EST


>> 6. Apply a recommendation from the script "checkpatch.pl".
>
> That's 6 different things, shouldn't this be 6 different patches?
>
> please redo.

Dan Carpenter requested to squash the previous update steps 5 and 6
into a single patch for better source code review.
Now I see further software development challenges to increase
the patch granularity even more as you suggest.

Which route would Lustre developers like to follow?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/