Re: [PATCH 08/10] perf tools: Add --raw-trace option

From: Jiri Olsa
Date: Tue Dec 22 2015 - 01:57:20 EST


On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 05:44:41PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:

SNIP

> >
> > I think the default is good with the 'trace' sort key as it is now:
> >
> > $ ./perf report -s trace
> > 27.01% offlineimap:17701 [120] S ==> swapper/1:0 [120]
> > 27.00% swapper/1:0 [120] R ==> offlineimap:17701 [120]
> >
> >
> > But for '--raw-trace' option rather than displaying fields in the '=' notation:
> >
> > $ ./perf report -s trace --raw-trace
> > 27.01% prev_comm=offlineimap prev_pid=17701 prev_prio=120 prev_state=1 next_comm=swapper/1 next_pid=0 next_prio=120
> > 27.00% prev_comm=swapper/1 prev_pid=0 prev_prio=120 prev_state=0 next_comm=offlineimap next_pid=17701 next_prio=120
> >
> >
> > it would be more readable to register all available columns as is possible to do now with:
> >
> > $ ./perf report -s prev_comm,prev_pid,prev_prio,prev_state,next_comm,next_pid,next_prio
> > Overhead prev_comm prev_pid prev_prio prev_state next_comm next_pid next_prio
> > 27.01% offlineimap 17701 120 1 swapper/1 0 120
> > 27.00% swapper/1 0 120 0 offlineimap 17701 120
> >
> >
> > it would be default output for 'perf report -s trace --raw-trace' command
> >
> > how about that?
>
>
> I agree with the latter is much more readable. But the dynamic sort
> keys are event specific while 'trace' is generic. So if there are
> more than one events, dynamic sort keys should be generated for each
> event and they'll show "N/A" for other events.

I see.. haven't realized that, maybe we should add
columns based in the hists object.. but I guess
that's out of scope of this patchset ;-)

>
> Also I don't like the --raw-trace option affects number of sort keys.
> Maybe it'd be better adding 'EVENT.*' dynamic sort key for your case?

that's good workaround, thanks

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/