Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, oom: introduce oom reaper

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Dec 17 2015 - 19:15:28 EST


On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 19:36:15 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This patch reduces the probability of such a lockup by introducing a
> specialized kernel thread (oom_reaper)

CONFIG_MMU=n:

slub.c:(.text+0x4184): undefined reference to `tlb_gather_mmu'
slub.c:(.text+0x41bc): undefined reference to `unmap_page_range'
slub.c:(.text+0x41d8): undefined reference to `tlb_finish_mmu'

I did the below so I can get an mmotm out the door, but hopefully
there's a cleaner way.

--- a/mm/oom_kill.c~mm-oom-introduce-oom-reaper-fix-3
+++ a/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -415,6 +415,7 @@ static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(oom_victi

bool oom_killer_disabled __read_mostly;

+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
/*
* OOM Reaper kernel thread which tries to reap the memory used by the OOM
* victim (if that is possible) to help the OOM killer to move on.
@@ -517,6 +518,27 @@ static void wake_oom_reaper(struct mm_st
mmdrop(mm);
}

+static int __init oom_init(void)
+{
+ oom_reaper_th = kthread_run(oom_reaper, NULL, "oom_reaper");
+ if (IS_ERR(oom_reaper_th)) {
+ pr_err("Unable to start OOM reaper %ld. Continuing regardless\n",
+ PTR_ERR(oom_reaper_th));
+ oom_reaper_th = NULL;
+ } else {
+ struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO-1 };
+
+ /*
+ * Make sure our oom reaper thread will get scheduled when
+ * ASAP and that it won't get preempted by malicious userspace.
+ */
+ sched_setscheduler(oom_reaper_th, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+module_init(oom_init)
+#endif
+
/**
* mark_oom_victim - mark the given task as OOM victim
* @tsk: task to mark
@@ -626,7 +648,9 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control
unsigned int victim_points = 0;
static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(oom_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
bool can_oom_reap = true;
+#endif

/*
* If the task is already exiting, don't alarm the sysadmin or kill
@@ -719,6 +743,7 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control
continue;
if (is_global_init(p))
continue;
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) ||
p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN) {
/*
@@ -729,13 +754,16 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control
can_oom_reap = false;
continue;
}
-
+#endif
do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p, true);
}
rcu_read_unlock();

+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
if (can_oom_reap)
wake_oom_reaper(mm);
+#endif
+
mmdrop(mm);
put_task_struct(victim);
}
@@ -887,23 +915,3 @@ void pagefault_out_of_memory(void)

mutex_unlock(&oom_lock);
}
-
-static int __init oom_init(void)
-{
- oom_reaper_th = kthread_run(oom_reaper, NULL, "oom_reaper");
- if (IS_ERR(oom_reaper_th)) {
- pr_err("Unable to start OOM reaper %ld. Continuing regardless\n",
- PTR_ERR(oom_reaper_th));
- oom_reaper_th = NULL;
- } else {
- struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO-1 };
-
- /*
- * Make sure our oom reaper thread will get scheduled when
- * ASAP and that it won't get preempted by malicious userspace.
- */
- sched_setscheduler(oom_reaper_th, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
- }
- return 0;
-}
-module_init(oom_init)
_

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/