Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Raspberry Pi power domains

[Ulf Hansson]

On 17 December 2015 at 21:11, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday 17 December 2015 11:03:47 Eric Anholt wrote:
>> >>
>> >>  .../bindings/arm/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-power.txt |  47 ++++
>> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi                 |  11 +
>> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835.dtsi                     |   2 +-
>> >>  arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig                          |  10 +
>> >>  arch/arm/mach-bcm/Makefile                         |   1 +
>> >>  arch/arm/mach-bcm/raspberrypi-power.c              | 247 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>  include/dt-bindings/arm/raspberrypi-power.h        |  41 ++++
>> >>  include/soc/bcm2835/raspberrypi-firmware.h         |   2 +
>> >>  8 files changed, 360 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-power.txt
>> >>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-bcm/raspberrypi-power.c
>> >>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/arm/raspberrypi-power.h
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> 2.6.2
>> >>
>> >
>> > Besides a nitpick for patch2, I would also reverse the order of patch3
>> > and patch2. DT docs should go in before the actual parsing of the new
>> > bindings/compatibles.
>> >
>> > Anyway, for the hole series, you may add my:
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Would your tree be pulling the series (since it's power domains), or
>> should I (since it's SOC stuff)?
>>
>
> All of the above files go through the arm-soc tree by default.

That should work as I don't see any other dependency, unless
Eric/Alexander think there is.

Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/