Re: [PATCH] virtio: use smp_load_acquire/smp_store_release

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:58:27AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:29:03PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > +static inline __virtio16 virtio_load_acquire(bool weak_barriers, __virtio16 *p)
> > +{
> > +	if (!weak_barriers) {
> > +		rmb();
> > +		return READ_ONCE(*p);
> > +	}
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > +	return smp_load_acquire(p);
> > +#else
> > +	dma_rmb();
> > +	return READ_ONCE(*p);
> > +#endif
> > +}
> 
> This too is wrong. Look for example at arm.
> 
> dma_rmb() is dmb(osh), while the smp_mb() used by smp_load_acquire() is
> dmb(ish). They order completely different types of memory accesses.
> 
> Also, load_acquire() is first load, then barrier, and an ACQUIRE barrier
> at that, not a READ barrier.

Yes - it just so happens that READ barrier is enough for where I use it
for virtio.

I really just need virtio_load_acquire that fences reads,
I don't care what happens to writes.

Given the confusion, maybe virtio_load_acquire is a bad name though.
Donnu what a good name would be.

virtio_load_acquire_rmb and virtio_store_release_wmb?


> So your #else branch should look something like:
> 
> 	var = READ_ONCE(*p);
> 	dma_mb();
> 	return var;
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/