Re: [RFC PATCH] lpfc: Add lockdep assertions

[Bart Van Assche]

On 11/20/2015 01:37 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Several functions in lpfc have comments stating that the function must be
> called with the hbalock (or hostlock, or ringlock) held. Add
> lockdep_assert_held() annotations to these functions, so one can actually
> verify the locks are held.
>
> [ ... ]
>
> @@ -2647,6 +2675,7 @@ lpfc_sli_iocbq_lookup(struct lpfc_hba *phba,
>   {
>   	struct lpfc_iocbq *cmd_iocb = NULL;
>   	uint16_t iotag;
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&phba->hbalock);
>
>   	iotag = prspiocb->iocb.ulpIoTag;

(replying to an e-mail of one month ago)

Please leave a blank line after declarations. Checkpatch should have 
reported this. Anyway:

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/