Re: [RFC PATCH v3 8/8] arm64: Ensure the secondary CPUs have safe ASIDBits size

From: Will Deacon
Date: Tue Dec 15 2015 - 07:02:28 EST


On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:57:19AM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> The ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1:ASIDBits determines the size of the mm context
> id and is used in the early boot to make decisions. The value is
> picked up from the Boot CPU and cannot be delayed until other CPUs
> are up. If a secondary CPU has a smaller size than that of the Boot
> CPU, things will break horribly and the usual SANITY check is not good
> enough to prevent the system from crashing. So, crash the system with
> enough information.
>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 ++
> arch/arm64/mm/context.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> index 2416578..bd8a0b9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> @@ -147,4 +147,6 @@ switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
> #define deactivate_mm(tsk,mm) do { } while (0)
> #define activate_mm(prev,next) switch_mm(prev, next, NULL)
>
> +void verify_cpu_asid_bits(void);
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index e63da0f..f7bcd30 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> #include <asm/cpu.h>
> #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> #include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
> +#include <asm/mmu_context.h>
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> #include <asm/sysreg.h>
>
> @@ -829,6 +830,7 @@ static u64 __raw_read_system_reg(u32 sys_id)
> */
> static void check_early_cpu_features(void)
> {
> + verify_cpu_asid_bits();
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/context.c b/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
> index 643bf4b..b945bb4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>
> #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
> +#include <asm/smp.h>
> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>
> static u32 asid_bits;
> @@ -62,6 +63,21 @@ static u32 get_cpu_asid_bits(void)
> return asid;
> }
>
> +/* Check if the current cpu's ASIDBits is compatible with asid_bits */
> +void verify_cpu_asid_bits(void)
> +{
> + u32 asid = get_cpu_asid_bits();
> +
> + if (asid < asid_bits) {
> + /* Differing ASIDBits is dangerous, crash the system */

This comment isn't much use. How about:

/*
* We cannot decrease the ASID size at runtime, so panic if we support
* fewer ASID bits than the boot CPU.
*/

> + pr_crit("CPU%d: has smaller ASIDBits(%u) than the one in use (%u)\n",
> + smp_processor_id(), asid, asid_bits);

"CPU%d: smaller ASID size (%d) than boot CPU (%u)\n"

> + update_cpu_boot_status(CPU_PANIC_KERNEL);
> + isb();

Why?

> + while(1);

We probably want the usuale wfe/wfi trick here. Perhaps we should have
an inline function for that.

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/