Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Fix int1 recursion when no perf_bp_event is registeredy

[Jeff Merkey]

Is there anything else I need to do on this patch, is it acceptable,
do you want a v3 that disables the errant breakpoints?  Problem with
that approach is if in fact there is a "lazy" breakpoint we might end
up clearing it being set if it fires off too soon.

So this is the first time I have submitted a patch through this new
process so what happens now?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/