Re: [PATCH 04/13] lib/vsprintf.c: expand field_width to 24 bits

From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Sat Dec 12 2015 - 19:47:05 EST


On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 22:30:04 +0200 Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I didn't find a BUILD_BUG/compiletime_assertion/... which would work
>> outside function context, so for now I just open-coded it.
>>
>
> It comes up occasionally. It would be better to create one.
>
>> +extern char __check_printf_spec[1-2*(sizeof(struct printf_spec) != 8)];
>
> Maybe something like
>
> /*
> * Description goes here
> */
> #define BUILD_BUG_ON_STATIC(unique_id, expr) \
> typedef char unique_id[1-2*(expr)];

Yeah, it would be really nice to get rid of unique_id, though I have
no idea how to achieve.

>
> BUILD_BUG_ON_STATIC(__check_printf_spec, sizeof(struct printf_spec) != 8);
>
> ("static" seems the wrong term, but what is the correct term for
> "outside of functions"?)

Just _EXT? Or _VAR?


--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/