Re: [PATCHv3 3/5] arm-cci: Add routines to enable/disable all counters

From: Mark Rutland
Date: Thu Dec 10 2015 - 10:32:39 EST


On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:03:25PM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> Adds helper routines to disable the counter controls for
> all the counters on the CCI PMU and restore it back, by
> preserving the original state in caller provided mask.
>
> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since V2:
> - Rename the functions to pmu_restore_counters, pmu_disable_counters
> - Added comment describing why we use a private mask
> ---
> drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> index 48936c8..91a9d5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> @@ -669,6 +669,44 @@ pmu_get_event(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, int idx)
> return pmu_read_register(cci_pmu, idx, CCI_PMU_EVT_SEL);
> }
>
> +
> +/*
> + * For all counters on the CCI-PMU, disable any 'enabled' counters,
> + * saving the changed counters in the mask, so that we can restore
> + * it later using pmu_restore_counters. The mask is private to the
> + * caller. We cannot rely on the used_mask maintained by the CCI_PMU
> + * as it only tells us if the counter is assigned to perf_event or not.
> + * The state of the perf_event cannot be locked by the PMU layer, hence
> + * we check the individual counter status (which can be locked by
> + * cci_pm->hw_events->pmu_lock).
> + */
> +static void __maybe_unused
> +pmu_disable_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < cci_pmu->num_cntrs; i++) {
> + if (pmu_counter_is_enabled(cci_pmu, i)) {
> + set_bit(i, mask);
> + pmu_disable_counter(cci_pmu, i);
> + } else
> + clear_bit(i, mask);

Can we not assume a clean mask to begin with?

> + }
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Restore the status of the counters. Reversal of the pmu_disable_counters().
> + * For each counter set in the mask, enable the counter back.
> + */
> +static void __maybe_unused
> +pmu_restore_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask)

This would probably be better with s/restore/enable/ for consistency
with pmu_disable_counters.

Other than that this looks fine to me.

Mark.

> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(i, mask, cci_pmu->num_cntrs)
> + pmu_enable_counter(cci_pmu, i);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Returns the number of programmable counters actually implemented
> * by the cci
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/