Re: [PATCH v5] sched/deadline: fix earliest_dl.next logic

[Luca Abeni]

Hi,

On 12/03/2015 03:25 AM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -202,16 +197,18 @@ static void dequeue_pushable_dl_task(struct rq *rq,
> > struct task_struct *p)
> >
> >                  next_node = rb_next(&p->pushable_dl_tasks);
> >                  dl_rq->pushable_dl_tasks_leftmost = next_node;
> > +               if (next_node)
> > +                       dl_rq->earliest_dl.next = rb_entry(next_node,
> > +                            struct task_struct,
> > pushable_dl_tasks)->dl.deadline;
>
> Juri mentioned "updated leftmost", I'm not sure if it means that:
>
> @@ -195,6 +195,9 @@ static void dequeue_pushable_dl_task(struct rq
> *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>
>                  next_node = rb_next(&p->pushable_dl_tasks);
>                  dl_rq->pushable_dl_tasks_leftmost = next_node;
> +               if (dl_rq->pushable_dl_tasks_leftmost)
> +                       dl_rq->earliest_dl.next =
> rb_entry(dl_rq->pushable_dl_tasks_leftmost,
> +                               struct task_struct,
> pushable_dl_tasks)->dl.deadline;
>          }
This is basically the same thing I tested (I just used "next_node" instead
of "dl_rq->pushable_dl_tasks_leftmost" because the name is shorter), so I
think it should work.


			Luca
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/