Re: [PATCH 1/1] soc: ti: knav_qmss_queue: Fix linking RAM setup for queue managers

[santosh shilimkar]

On 11/20/2015 3:39 PM, Michal Morawiec wrote:
> Configure linking RAM for both queue managers also in case
> when only linking RAM 0 is specified in device tree.
why ?

> Signed-off-by: Michal Morawiec <michal.1.morawiec.ext@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
> index 6d8646d..a809c30 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
> @@ -1173,7 +1173,7 @@ static int knav_queue_setup_link_ram(struct knav_device *kdev)
>
>   		block++;
>   		if (!block->size)
> -			return 0;
> +			continue;
You have to expand this a bit for me. Because you really don't
want kernel code to run the configuration on hardware which doesn't
exist. I mean device tree suppose to specify the linking RAM for both
QMs unless and until there is a reason not too.

Regards,
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/