Re: [RFC PATCH] restrict /dev/mem to idle io memory ranges

[Kees Cook]

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 09:31:33AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> This effectively promotes IORESOURCE_BUSY to IORESOURCE_EXCLUSIVE
>>> semantics by default.  If userspace really believes it is safe to access
>>> the memory region it can also perform the extra step of disabling an
>>> active driver.  This protects device address ranges with read side
>>> effects and otherwise directs userspace to use the driver.
>>
>> I'm happy with this as long as we retain the option to disable this
>> new behaviour.
>>
>> The reason being, when developing a driver, it is _very_ useful to
>> be able to poke around in the device's (and system memory) address
>> spaces with tools like devmem2 to work out what's going on when
>> things go wrong.
>>
>> To put it another way, I think it's a good idea to disable access to
>> these regions on production systems, but for driver development, we
>> want to retain the ability to poke around in physical address space
>> in any way we so desire.
>>
>
> Sounds ok to me, but I do think it's a good idea to default it to the
> same value as STRICT_DEVMEM.  Perhaps:
>
> bool "Filter I/O access to /dev/mem" if EXPERT
> default STRICT_DEVMEM
>
> When this in do we even need IORESOURCE_EXCLUSIVE?  It's barely used.

Let's leave it for now to give us the debugging granularity Russell
mentioned. If it turns out it's never used, we can drop it in the
future.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/