Re: [PATCH 1/2] devicetree: add binding for Sigma Designs SMP86xx interrupt controller

[Måns Rullgård]

Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 06:33:45PM +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>> This adds a binding for the secondary interrupt controller in
>> Sigma Designs SMP86xx and SMP87xx chips.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  .../interrupt-controller/sigma,smp8642-intc.txt    | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sigma,smp8642-intc.txt
>> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sigma,smp8642-intc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sigma,smp8642-intc.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..f82cddf
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sigma,smp8642-intc.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
>> +Sigma Designs SMP86xx/SMP87xx secondary interrupt controller
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible: should be "sigma,smp8642-intc"
>> +- reg: physical address of MMIO region
>> +- interrupt-parent: phandle of parent interrupt controller
>> +- interrupt-controller: boolean
>> +
>> +One child node per control block with properties:
>> +- sigma,reg-offset: offset of registers from main base address
>
> Your driver defines these offsets too.
>
> Do you expect to have many different variations here? If not, I would 
> get rid of all the child nodes and just hard code it in the driver.

Then how will other DT nodes reference the correct one?

-- 
Måns Rullgård
mans@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/