Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection

[Morten Rasmussen]

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 07:11:31AM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:09:44 +0000
> Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Okay. But it does mean that the defeault idle period is 5 ticks (50ms
> > @ HZ=100) and not 5 ms
> correct. my reason is to scale with various HZ values.

50ms seems quite long for embedded applications. OTOH, it has to be long
enough to enter a package idle state and stay there for a while. You
would surely notice it when it kicks in on an Android device.

Do you intend to use it only as a last option? One might want to keep
using inefficient frequencies (P-states) if those don't cause UI lag
then.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/