Re: [PATCH 12/13] perf test: Test BPF prologue

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Tue Nov 17 2015 - 07:20:31 EST


Em Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:38:37PM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu:
> On 2015/11/17 9:29, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >How about:
> >
> > # perf test -v BPF
> > 37: Test BPF filter:
> > 37.1: test a : Ok
> > 37.2: test b : Ok
> > 37.3: Test BPF prologue generation : Ok
> > 37.4: Another... : Ok
> > 37: Test BPF filter : Ok
> > #

> I think what you want is to report state of subtests *without* -v?

> That would be nice but changing of perf testing infrastructure is required
> because there's no "sub-test" before, and we both agree that testcase
> should be silent without '-v', so we need a way to output them in
> builtin-test.c.

> Let me try it but I think it should not be a blocking problem.

Thanks for looking into this,

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/