Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] KASAN for arm64

From: Suzuki K. Poulose
Date: Mon Nov 16 2015 - 06:26:49 EST


On 13/10/15 09:34, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 06:52:56PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
Andrey Ryabinin (3):
arm64: move PGD_SIZE definition to pgalloc.h
arm64: add KASAN support
Documentation/features/KASAN: arm64 supports KASAN now

Linus Walleij (1):
ARM64: kasan: print memory assignment

Patches queued for 4.4. Thanks.


Hi,

I get the following failure with KASAN + 16K_PAGES + 48BIT_VA, with 4.4-rc1:


arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c: In function ‘kasan_early_init’:
include/linux/compiler.h:484:38: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_95’ declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: !IS_ALIGNED(KASAN_SHADOW_END, PGDIR_SIZE)
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __LINE__)
^
include/linux/compiler.h:467:4: note: in definition of macro ‘__compiletime_assert’
prefix ## suffix(); \
^
include/linux/compiler.h:484:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘_compiletime_assert’
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __LINE__)
^
include/linux/bug.h:50:37: note: in expansion of macro ‘compiletime_assert’
#define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
^
include/linux/bug.h:74:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG’
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
^
arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c:95:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUILD_BUG_ON’
BUILD_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(KASAN_SHADOW_END, PGDIR_SIZE));


---

The problem is that the PGDIR_SIZE is (1UL << 47) with 16K+48bit, which makes
the KASAN_SHADOW_END unaligned(which is aligned to (1UL << (48 - 3)) ). Is the
alignment really needed ? Thoughts on how best we could fix this ?

Cheers
Suzuki

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/