Re: [patch, v2] blk-mq: avoid excessive boot delays with large lun counts

From: Ming Lei
Date: Sat Oct 31 2015 - 20:33:30 EST


On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Zhangqing Luo reported long boot times on a system with thousands of
> LUNs when scsi-mq was enabled. He narrowed the problem down to
> blk_mq_add_queue_tag_set, where every queue is frozen in order to set
> the BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED flag. Each added device will freeze all queues
> added before it in sequence, which involves waiting for an RCU grace
> period for each one. We don't need to do this. After the second queue
> is added, only new queues need to be initialized with the shared tag.
> We can do that by percolating the flag up to the blk_mq_tag_set, and
> updating the newly added queue's hctxs if the flag is set.
>
> This problem was introduced by commit 0d2602ca30e41 (blk-mq: improve
> support for shared tags maps).
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Jason Luo <zhangqing.luo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>

You can add
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
if the following trivial issues(especially the 2nd one) are addressed.

>
> ---
> Changes from v1:
> - addressed review comments from Ming, which simplified the patch
>
> Jason, if you could sanity test this patch to make sure it still solves
> your problem, that would be greatly appreciated.
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 85f0143..12f79af 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -1673,7 +1673,7 @@ static int blk_mq_init_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hctx->dispatch);
> hctx->queue = q;
> hctx->queue_num = hctx_idx;
> - hctx->flags = set->flags;
> + hctx->flags = set->flags & ~BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED;
>
> blk_mq_init_cpu_notifier(&hctx->cpu_notifier,
> blk_mq_hctx_notify, hctx);
> @@ -1860,27 +1860,26 @@ static void blk_mq_map_swqueue(struct request_queue *q,
> }
> }
>
> -static void blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
> +static void queue_set_hctx_shared(struct request_queue *q, bool shared)
> {
> struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> - struct request_queue *q;
> - bool shared;
> int i;
>
> - if (set->tag_list.next == set->tag_list.prev)
> - shared = false;
> - else
> - shared = true;
> + queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
> + if (shared)
> + hctx->flags |= BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED;
> + else
> + hctx->flags &= ~BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, bool shared)
> +{
> + struct request_queue *q;
>
> list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list) {
> blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
> -
> - queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
> - if (shared)
> - hctx->flags |= BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED;
> - else
> - hctx->flags &= ~BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED;
> - }
> + queue_set_hctx_shared(q, shared);
> blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
> }
> }
> @@ -1891,7 +1890,12 @@ static void blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(struct request_queue *q)
>
> mutex_lock(&set->tag_list_lock);
> list_del_init(&q->tag_set_list);
> - blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(set);
> + if (set->tag_list.next == set->tag_list.prev) {

list_is_singular() should be better.

> + /* just transitioned to unshared */
> + set->flags &= ~BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED;
> + /* update existing queue */
> + blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(set, false);
> + }
> mutex_unlock(&set->tag_list_lock);
> }
>
> @@ -1901,8 +1905,17 @@ static void blk_mq_add_queue_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
> q->tag_set = set;
>
> mutex_lock(&set->tag_list_lock);
> +
> + /* Check to see if we're transitioning to shared (from 1 to 2 queues). */
> + if (!list_empty(&set->tag_list) && !(set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED)) {
> + set->flags |= BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED;
> + /* update existing queue */
> + blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(set, true);
> + }
> + if (set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED)

The above should be 'else if', otherwise the current queue will be set
twice.

> + queue_set_hctx_shared(q, true);
> list_add_tail(&q->tag_set_list, &set->tag_list);
> - blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(set);
> +
> mutex_unlock(&set->tag_list_lock);
> }
>



--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/