Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] PCI: hv: New paravirtual PCI front-end for Hyper-V VMs

From: Jiang Liu
Date: Tue Oct 27 2015 - 22:01:57 EST


On 2015/10/28 4:38, Jake Oshins wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jiang Liu [mailto:jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 12:11 AM
>> To: Jake Oshins <jakeo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; KY
>> Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; olaf@xxxxxxxxx; apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx; tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Haiyang Zhang
>> <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx;
>> bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] PCI: hv: New paravirtual PCI front-end for Hyper-
>> V VMs
>>
>> On 2015/10/27 7:15, jakeo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> From: Jake Oshins <jakeo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
> (snip)
>>> +/**
>>> + * hv_pcie_init_irq_domain() - Initialize IRQ domain
>>> + * @hbus: The root PCI bus
>>> + *
>>> + * Return: '0' on success and error value on failure
>>> + */
>>> +static int hv_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct hv_pcibus_device *hbus)
>>> +{
>>> + hbus->msi_info.chip = &hv_msi_irq_chip;
>>> + hbus->msi_info.chip_data = hbus;
>>> + hbus->msi_info.ops = &hv_msi_ops;
>>> + hbus->msi_info.flags = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS |
>>> + MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS |
>> MSI_FLAG_MULTI_PCI_MSI |
>>> + MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX);
>> When interrupt remapping is not supported, x86 vector allocator
>> can't support multiple MSI because it can't allocate continuous
>> vectors yet. So please confirm whether we could enable
>> MSI_FLAG_MULTI_PCI_MSI for HV.
>>
>
> We can actually handle the remapping in the hypervisor. I'll add a comment to that effect.
>
>>> + hbus->msi_info.handler = handle_edge_irq;
>>> + hbus->msi_info.handler_name = "edge";
>>> + hbus->msi_info.data = hbus;
>> How about using following pattern so we could avoid exporting
>> too many interfaces?
>>
>> struct irq_domain *parent_domain = NULL;
>> hbus->msi_info.chip = &hv_msi_irq_chip;
>> hbus->msi_info.ops = &hv_msi_ops;
>> // Let arch code to fill in default ops for chip and domain
>> x86_setup_default_msi_irqdomian_info(&hbus->msi_info,
>> &parent_domain);
>> // Override default ops if not applicable
>> hbus->irq_domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(hbus->fwnode,
>> &hbus->msi_info,
>> parent_domain);
>>
>
> I understand your point here, but I'm having trouble making it play out. When I look at this, the only functions or structures which are supplied straight from exports (in my proposed patches) are irq_chip_ack_parent(), pci_msi_prepare() and x86_vector_domain. The other exports either already exist for other reasons or they're needed within functions that I need to supply. If you feel strongly that adding a new function to avoid exporting these is the right way to go, I'll do it, but I want to confirm that first.
No strong preference here, just feeling that pci_msi_prepare() and
x86_vector_domain are arch specific:)

And I was hoping that we could find some commonality between this
driver and the VMD driver posted at http://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/27/607
so we could abstract the common part into core.

For the VMD driver, it has put the code to create irqdomain into core
as vmd_create_irq_domain().

Thanks,
Gerry

>
> Thanks,
> Jake Oshins
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/