Re: [PATCH v3 14/15] net: wireless: ath: Remove unneeded variable ret returning 0

From: punit vara
Date: Thu Oct 22 2015 - 14:54:01 EST


On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 10/22/2015 09:26 PM, Punit Vara wrote:
>
>> This patch is to the ath5k/eeprom.c that fixes up warning caught by
>> coccicheck:
>>
>> -Unneeded variable: "ret". Return "0" on line 1733
>>
>> Remove unneccesary variable ret created to return zero.
>>
>> Also removed empty line suggested by Sergei
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Punit Vara <punitvara@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/eeprom.c | 5 ++---
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/eeprom.c
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/eeprom.c
>> index 94d34ee..0c82ea5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/eeprom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/eeprom.c
>> @@ -1707,8 +1707,7 @@ ath5k_eeprom_read_spur_chans(struct ath5k_hw *ah)
>> struct ath5k_eeprom_info *ee = &ah->ah_capabilities.cap_eeprom;
>> u32 offset;
>> u16 val;
>> - int ret = 0, i;
>> -
>
>
> No, this one shouldn't have been removed. There should an empty line
> between the declarations and the statements.
>
>> + int i;
>> offset = AR5K_EEPROM_CTL(ee->ee_version) +
>> AR5K_EEPROM_N_CTLS(ee->ee_version);
>>
>
> MBR, Sergei
>

I have resent patch with update but I cant see it in my mailbox I dont
know Why.. Sorry if You are getting mail more time. I am sending final
version v5 as last.Please sorry for inconvenience
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/