Re: [PATCH v4 04/22] of: add function to allow probing a device from a OF node

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Wed Oct 21 2015 - 07:29:16 EST


Hi Tomeu,

On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Walks the OF tree up and finds the closest ancestor that has a struct
> device associated with it, probing it if isn't bound to a driver yet.
>
> The above should ensure that the dependency represented by the passed OF
> node is available, because probing a device should cause its descendants
> to be probed as well (when they get registered).
>
> Subsystems can use this when looking up resources for drivers, to reduce
> the chances of deferred probes because of the probing order of devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Rename of_platform_probe to of_device_probe
> - Use device_node.device instead of device_node.platform_dev
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Set and use device_node.platform_dev instead of reversing the logic to
> find the platform device that encloses a device node.
> - Drop the fwnode API to probe firmware nodes and add OF-only API for
> now. I think this same scheme could be used for machines with ACPI,
> but I haven't been able to find one that had to defer its probes because
> of the device probe order.
>
> Changes in v2: None
>
> drivers/of/device.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/of/platform.c | 2 ++
> include/linux/of_device.h | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c
> index 8b91ea241b10..c32ac7b6fbe2 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/device.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/device.c
> @@ -286,3 +286,61 @@ int of_device_uevent_modalias(struct device *dev, struct kobj_uevent_env *env)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +/**
> + * of_device_probe() - Probe device associated with OF node
> + * @np: node to probe
> + *
> + * Probe the device associated with the passed device node.
> + */
> +void of_device_probe(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> + struct device_node *target;
> + struct device *dev = NULL;
> +
> + if (!of_root || !of_node_check_flag(of_root, OF_POPULATED_BUS))
> + return;
> +
> + if (!np)
> + return;
> +
> + of_node_get(np);
> +
> + /* Find the closest ancestor that has a device associated */
> + for (target = np;
> + !of_node_is_root(target);
> + target = of_get_next_parent(target))
> + if (target->device) {
> + dev = target->device;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + of_node_put(target);
> +
> + if (!dev) {
> + pr_warn("Couldn't find a device for node '%s'\n",
> + of_node_full_name(np));

This is triggered for all devices with clocks instantiated through
CLK_OF_DECLARE().
E.g. on r8a7791/koelsch ("... | sort | uniq -c"):

1 Couldn't find a device for node '/clocks/audio_clk_a'
1 Couldn't find a device for node '/clocks/audio_clk_b'
1 Couldn't find a device for node '/clocks/audio_clk_c'
2 Couldn't find a device for node '/clocks/cpg_clocks@e6150000'
1 Couldn't find a device for node '/clocks/m2_clk'
2 Couldn't find a device for node '/clocks/mstp0_clks@e6150130'
34 Couldn't find a device for node '/clocks/mstp10_clks@e6150998'
2 Couldn't find a device for node '/clocks/mstp1_clks@e6150134'
2 Couldn't find a device for node '/clocks/mstp2_clks@e6150138'
10 Couldn't find a device for node '/clocks/mstp3_clks@e615013c'
3 Couldn't find a device for node '/clocks/mstp5_clks@e6150144'
8 Couldn't find a device for node '/clocks/mstp7_clks@e615014c'
4 Couldn't find a device for node '/clocks/mstp8_clks@e6150990'
22 Couldn't find a device for node '/clocks/mstp9_clks@e6150994'
1 Couldn't find a device for node '/clocks/pcie_bus_clk'

Corresponding DTS is arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi.

> + return;
> + }

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/